The information you provided appears to be a news article or excerpt discussing the adjournment of the proceedings of a judicial commission headed by Justice Qazi Faez Isa in Pakistan. The commission was formed to probe alleged audio leaks that raised concerns about the independence of the judiciary. However, on the previous day, the Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial ordered the commission to suspend its proceedings.
During the hearing, Justice Isa questioned the AGP about the court order and the commission’s notification. He also raised concerns about the violation of privacy and the need to follow the law and code of conduct. The AGP admitted that the law did not mention the need for the chief justice’s advice and stated that the government acted according to the law.
In another proceeding, the Supreme Court restrained the commission from further investigation and issued notices to the respondents, including the AGP. The Chief Justice emphasized the need to respect and protect all institutions, including the judiciary, and raised concerns about interference in the judiciary’s administrative matters. The court’s order referred to arguments regarding the scope of the Investigation for Fair Trial Act and the violation of privacy rights.
It is important to note that the information provided is based on the specific news article or excerpt you shared, and my response is limited to the details mentioned in that text. For a comprehensive understanding of the situation, it is advisable to refer to multiple sources and follow up on any updates or developments regarding the case.